TITLE

Three Can Keep a Secret, If Two of Them Are Dead: A Thought Experiment Around Compelled Public Disclosure of "Anonymous" Political Expenditures

AUTHOR(S)
Birkenstock, Joseph M.
PUB. DATE
June 2012
SOURCE
Journal of Law & Politics;Summer2012, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p609
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on the issue of public disclosure with respect to the concept of anonymity especially in political expenditures in the U.S. The content of the political communication in the country is based on the disclosure regimes of public disclosure and private disclosure. Information on the role of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the U.S. regarding the issue anonymity in disclosures is also presented.
ACCESSION #
79193005

 

Related Articles

  • Anonymity and Authority. Schauer, Frederick // Journal of Law & Politics;Summer2012, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p597 

    The article presents information on the issue of anonymity with respect to the laws regarding the campaign finance disclosure in the U.S. The decisions of the Supreme Court of the U.S. regarding the issue of anonymity and campaign finance is concerned with establishment and protection of the...

  • Secrets, Lies, and Disclosure. Norton, Helen // Journal of Law & Politics;Summer2012, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p641 

    An essay is presented on the laws of the disclosure of the campaign financing and political campaigns with respect to the concept of disclosure of information, secrets and lies. The political communication and speeches are on the basis of the anonymity and pseudomynity of the public speakers....

  • A Penny for Your Votes: Eliminating Corporate Contribution Bans and Promoting Disclosure After Citizens United. Raaii, Sarah G. // Iowa Law Review;Mar2015, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p1357 

    In 2010, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission established that the First Amendment protects corporate political speech. Citizens United subjected the federal ban on corporate independent expenditures to strict scrutiny, ultimately holding the ban unconstitutional. This Note argues that...

  • Judicial candidates may not directly solicit contributions.  // Florida Bar News;6/1/2014, Vol. 41 Issue 11, p17 

    The article focuses on the reiteration of the Florida Supreme Court regarding the prohibition for judicial candidates to seek for a campaign contribution directly to the public in compliance with the U.S. First Amendment.

  • The "Ambiguous Giving Out": The Complicated Roles of Disclosure and Anonymity in Political Activity. Karlan, Pamela S. // Journal of Law & Politics;Summer2012, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p655 

    The article presents information on the role of disclosure of information and anonymity in political activity in the U.S. with respect to the establishment and protection of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the country. The citizens play an important role in the political activities...

  • IOWA RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC. V. TOOKER: THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT IGNORES CITIZENS UNITED BY STRIKING DOWN AN IOWA CAMPAIGN FINANCE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT. Sund, J. David // Creighton Law Review;Jun2015, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p659 

    The article discusses the author's contention that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit erred when it struck down an Iowa campaign finance (CF) law's disclosure requirement in the case Iowa Right to Life Committee Inc. v. Tooker. Freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the...

  • Big Surprise: New York Times wallows in muddled reasoning on campaign finance restrictions. VON SPAKOVSKY, HANS A. // Human Events;1/23/2012, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p7 

    The article explores the controversies surrounding a "New York Times" editorial which allegedly showed a complete misunderstanding of the campaign finance law, its history and the 1st amendment. The newspaper was reported to be apoplectic over an amicus brief filed by the Republican National...

  • The Clarence Thomas Court? GANDELMAN, JOE // Moderate Voice;4/4/2014, p10 

    The article reflects on the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's landmark decision calling for the total elimination of individual contribution caps in financing political campaigns. Thomas says that campaign finance laws are not in accordance with the U.S. Constitution First Amendment....

  • Let Money Talk. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Jan2014, Vol. 45 Issue 8, p18 

    The article focuses on the possible impact of the proposed restrictions on political campaign contribution and spending by the U.S. Congress. It states that limiting the spending of advertisers on newspapers would violate the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. The Federal Election...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics