TITLE

Donor Disclosure: Undermining the First Amendment

AUTHOR(S)
Mitchell, Cleta
PUB. DATE
May 2012
SOURCE
Minnesota Law Review;2012, Vol. 96 Issue 5, p1755
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on the legal aspects of American political campaign donations, including an analysis of the protections afforded to citizens under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC). Legal regulations for mass media corporations are addressed, along with an examination of political campaign finance reform measures.
ACCESSION #
82747999

 

Related Articles

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune;3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p72 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune International (Europe);3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p50 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • DIVIDING CITIZENS UNITED: THE CASE V. THE CONTROVERSY. Tribe, Laurence H. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p463 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC related to the spending of money by corporations in the elections and use for the prevention of political corruption and its improper influence in the electoral process. It mentions that the decision is based on the First...

  • CITIZENS UNITED IMPACT ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS.  // Drake Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p685 

    The article presents a panel discussion on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission on judicial elections. Topics include campaign finance restrictions, the First Amendment rights of corporations, and how corporate donors...

  • A Triumph for Political Speech. Rubin, Jennifer // Commentary;May2010, Vol. 129 Issue 5, p16 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in which the court struck down the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. It describes McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform and its goal to limit contributions from...

  • A MADISONIAN CASE FOR DISCLOSURE. Johnstone, Anthony // George Mason Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p413 

    The article discusses U.S. campaign finance disclosure reform in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in the cases of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and John Doe #1 v. Reed, as well as the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In Citizens United, the court held...

  • THE INCORPORATION OF DEMOCRACY: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S PHILOSOPHY OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CITIZENS UNITED. Schaeffer, Jarrod L. // Boston University Law Review;Oct2011, Vol. 91 Issue 5, p1783 

    The article examines the judicial philosophy of U.S. Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy concerning the 2010 case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002. The author suggests that the Citizens United should be viewed as Kennedy's...

  • First Amendment Fault Lines and the Citizens United Decision. Youn, Monica // Harvard Law & Policy Review;Jan2011, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p135 

    The article focuses on the campaign finance doctrine, with respect to the constitutional fault line between the volitional and commodity accounts of the U.S. First Amendment value and the court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC). It says that the differential...

  • A Penny for Your Votes: Eliminating Corporate Contribution Bans and Promoting Disclosure After Citizens United. Raaii, Sarah G. // Iowa Law Review;Mar2015, Vol. 100 Issue 3, p1357 

    In 2010, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission established that the First Amendment protects corporate political speech. Citizens United subjected the federal ban on corporate independent expenditures to strict scrutiny, ultimately holding the ban unconstitutional. This Note argues that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics