TITLE

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REGULATION

PUB. DATE
March 2015
SOURCE
Supreme Court Debates;Mar2015, Vol. 18 Issue 3, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Excerpt
ABSTRACT
An excerpt from the report "The Constitutionality of Campaign Finance Regulation: Buckley v. Valeo and Its Supreme Court Progeny" in the November 18, 2008 issue is presented.
ACCESSION #
102887143

 

Related Articles

  • SAVING BUCKLEY: CREATING A STABLE CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAMEWORK. Abraham, J. Robert // Columbia Law Review;May2010, Vol. 110 Issue 4, p1078 

    Since 1976, Buckley v. Valeo's contribution-expenditure distinction has been the touchstone of the campaign finance framework. Currently, lower courts are addressing the constitutionality of contribution limits to independent expenditure committees and some have adopted doctrinal approaches that...

  • Money Managers. Tomasky, Michael // Newsweek Global;2/22/2013, Vol. 161 Issue 8, p1 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, which deals with campaign finance reform in the U.S. Topics include the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the "spending as speech" doctrine from...

  • PRIVATE CAUSE OF AC TION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF UNDER MARYLAND'S CAMP AIGN FINANCE LAWS. Stichel, H. Mark; Greenfeld, Joshua // Maryland Bar Journal;Mar/Apr2015, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p4 

    The article focuses on the need to bring a private cause of action to seek injunctive relief for non-compliance with campaign finance requirements by voters or candidates Election Law of Maryland. It mentions the U.S. Supreme Court cases Buckley v. Valeo and McCutcheon v. Federal Election...

  • J. SKELLY WRIGHT'S DEMOCRATIC FIRST AMENDMENT. Kalb, Johanna // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p107 

    An essay is presented on Justice J. Skelly Wright's opinion in a court case Buckley v. Valeo as a judge of the Circuit Court, and on first democratic amendment in the constitution related to campaign funding. Topics discussed include criticism made by Wright on the United States Supreme Court's...

  • Corruption Temptation. Charles, Guy-Uriel E. // California Law Review;Feb2014, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p25 

    In response to Professor Lawrence Lessig's Jorde Lecture, I suggest that corruption is not the proper conceptual vehicle for thinking about the problems that Professor Lessig wants us to think about. I argue that Professor Lessig's real concern is that, for the vast majority of citizens, wealth...

  • Is "Dependence Corruption" the Solution to America's Campaign Finance Problems? Cain, Bruce E. // California Law Review;Feb2014, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p37 

    U.S. campaign finance regulation is currently in bad shape. The combination of congressional inaction, regulatory ineffectiveness, and constitutional constraint perpetuates a status quo that no one intended and many deplore. Public financing for presidential elections is effectively dead, while...

  • State Session Freeze Laws--Potential Solution or Unconstitutional Restriction? Swaim, Dru // Seattle University Law Review;2013, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p255 

    The article focuses on the U.S Supreme Court's decision in case Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n that addressed restrictions on U.S federal campaign finance law. Topics discussed include the impact of the lawsuit Citizens United on the restrictions on campaign contributions and...

  • Know Your Political Theory. Shapiro, Robert E. // Litigation;Fall2014, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p59 

    The article offers information on the history, development, and significance of the U.S. Constitution in establishing and setting the structure of political theory with reference to the U.S. Chief Justice John Marshall's in McCulloch v. Maryland. It discusses the judicial decision of the U.S....

  • THAT WE ARE UNDERLINGS: THE REAL PROBLEMS IN DISCIPLINING POLITICAL SPENDING AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Purdy, Jedediah // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p391 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. FEC related to the political spending of corporations in campaign which enables for preventing the political corruption. It mentions that the U.S. First Amendment protections can justify limits on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics