TITLE

Nuclear energy in Belgium Still a future?

AUTHOR(S)
Andrews, Jonathan
PUB. DATE
December 2008
SOURCE
OECD Observer;Dec2008/Jan2009, Issue 270/271, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Interview
ABSTRACT
The article presents an interview with Theo Van Rentergem, senior advisor at the Belgian Energy Administration in Belgium. Rentergem cites on the possibility of the Belgian government to give new impetus to its nuclear energy programmes, similar with its neighboring countries France and Great Britain. He reveals that the country's seven nuclear reactors are providing 55% of its nuclear requirements, along with imported gas and renewable energy sources.
ACCESSION #
48734865

 

Related Articles

  • 3.0 Statistics of nuclear energy and power.  // Global Nuclear Energy Report;2011, p63 

    The article reports on the statistics of nuclear energy worldwide. It offers an overview of its global consumption in 1965 which reached 6 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe) increasing to 636 in 2006 but fell by 611 in 2009. It notes that the said decrease was due to the rise of natural gas...

  • ECONOMIC IMPACT: NUCLEAR PACKS $2.3 BILLION PUNCH.  // Business North Carolina;Dec2011 Energizer Supplement, p16 

    The article discusses the economic contribution of the nuclear power business in Carolinas including 2.3 billion U.S. dollars in wages, thirty seven thousand job opportunities and 750 million U.S. dollars state and local taxes. It mentions the utilities in the industry which own commercial...

  • TVA's Renewed Vision and Nuclear's Role. McCollum, Bill // Power Engineering;Nov2010, Vol. 114 Issue 11, Special section p6 

    The article discusses the renewed vision of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to become the U.S. leader in new nuclear generation and in cleaner production. It mentions that the nuclear expansion, gas generation and renewable energy sources will move TVA towards its goal of a lower-emission...

  • The economics of a US civilian nuclear phase-out. Lovins, Amory B. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Mar2013, Vol. 69 Issue 2, p44 

    In the United States, which trades three-fifths of its electricity in competitive markets, the prohibitive capital cost of new nuclear power plants ensures that only a handful will be built. Nonetheless, with 40-year licenses being extended to 60 years, the 104 existing reactors’...

  • New Nuclear Is Not Cost-Competitive. Cooper, Mark // Energy Daily;10/26/2009, p4 

    The article reports that construction of new nuclear reactors are not cost competitive with alternative energy sources in the U.S. Nuclear industry lobbyists are looking to obtain loans from taxpayers and rate payers to finance the development of nuclear reactors. On the other hand, demand for...

  • Peering ahead. Duckett, Adam // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Nov2015, Issue 893, p3 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including a model of how biorefining in Thailand can flexibly integrate processes to use municipal waste to generate heat and power with recycled streams of paper and compost, the planned...

  • LEADER: There's no 'silver bullet' to the electricity debate.  // Engineer (Online Edition);6/6/2011, p5 

    The author reflects on the decision of Germany and Scotland to abandon nuclear power and pursue renewable technologies. He says that the move stirs difficulty for both countries to match the generating capacity of nuclear reactors with renewables. He emphasizes that it is difficult for both...

  • 2011–2012 world nuclear industry status report. Schneider, Mycle; Froggatt, Antony // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep2012, Vol. 68 Issue 5, p8 

    The market niche that nuclear power once held is disappearing. The key nuclear indicators—including the number of operating reactors, installed capacity, power generation, and share of total electricity generation—all show that the global nuclear industry is in decline. In 2012,...

  • Japan's Post-Fukushima Nuclear Energy Conundrum. Goto, Shihoko // World Politics Review (19446284);11/13/2012, p3 

    The article discusses Japan's response to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant caused by the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011. Topics include the decision by Japan's government to phase out nuclear energy entirely by 2040, why decreased U.S. dependence on oil from the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics