TITLE

What are the essential elements to enable patient participation in medical decision making?

AUTHOR(S)
Fraenkel, Liana; McGraw, Sarah
PUB. DATE
May 2007
SOURCE
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;May2007, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p614
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
journal article
ABSTRACT
Background: Patient participation in shared decision making (SDM) results in increased patient knowledge, adherence, and improved outcomes. Despite the benefits of the SDM model, many patients do not attain the level of participation they desire.Objective: To gain a more complete understanding of the essential elements, or the prerequisites, critical to active patient participation in medical decision making from the patient's perspective.Design: Qualitative study.Setting: Individual, in-depth patient interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Two analysts independently read the transcripts and jointly developed a list of codes.Patients: Twenty-six consecutive subjects drawn from community dwelling subjects undergoing bone density measurements.Measurements: Respondents' experiences and beliefs related to patient participation in SDM.Results: Five elements were repeatedly described by respondents as being essential to enable patient participation in medical decision making: (1) patient knowledge, (2) explicit encouragement of patient participation by physicians, (3) appreciation of the patient's responsibility/rights to play an active role in decision making, (4) awareness of choice, and (5) time.Limitations: The generalizability of the results is limited by the homogeneity of the study sample.Conclusions: Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest that several needs must be met before patients can become active participants in decisions related to their health care. These needs include ensuring that patients (1) appreciate that there is uncertainty in medicine and "buy in" to the importance of active patient participation in decisions related to their health care, (2) understand the trade-offs related to available options, and (3) have the opportunity to discuss these options with their physician to arrive at a decision concordant with their values.
ACCESSION #
25056425

 

Related Articles

  • Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data. Teno, Joan M.; Stevens, Marguerite; Spernak, Stephanie; Lynn, Joanne; Teno; Teno, J M; Stevens, M; Spernak, S; Lynn, J // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul1988, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p439 

    Objective: To understand the role of written advance directives (ADs) in medical decision making through examination of qualitative and quantitative data sources. We specifically wanted to address whether physicians unilaterally disregard advance directives.Design:...

  • Getting by: underuse of interpreters by resident physicians. Diamond, Lisa; Schenker, Yael; Curry, Leslie; Bradley, Elizabeth; Fernandez, Alicia; Diamond, Lisa C; Bradley, Elizabeth H // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Feb2009, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p256 

    Background: Language barriers complicate physician-patient communication and adversely affect healthcare quality. Research suggests that physicians underuse interpreters despite evidence of benefits and even when services are readily available. The reasons underlying the underuse of...

  • Decision-making role preferences among patients with HIV: associations with patient and provider characteristics and communication behaviors. Kumar, Rashmi; Korthuis, P. Todd; Saha, Somnath; Chander, Geetanjali; Sharp, Victoria; Cohn, Jonathon; Moore, Richard; Beach, Mary Catherine // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jun2010, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p517 

    Background: A preference for shared decision-making among patients with HIV has been associated with better health outcomes. One possible explanation for this association is that patients who prefer a more active role in decision-making are more engaged in the communication process...

  • Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. Fischer, Gary S.; Tulsky, James A.; Rose, Mary R.; Siminoff, Laura A.; Arnold, Robert M.; Fischer; Fischer, G S; Tulsky, J A; Rose, M R; Siminoff, L A; Arnold, R M // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul1988, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p447 

    Objective: To determine patient knowledge about life-sustaining treatments and physician understanding of patient preferences for proxies and treatments after outpatient discussions about advance directives.Design: Cross-sectional interview-based and questionnaire-based...

  • Is patients' preferred involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients with HIV? Beach, Mary Catherine; Duggan, Patrick S.; Moore, Richard O.; Moore, Richard D // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Aug2007, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p1119 

    Background: Previous studies suggest that patients who are more involved in their medical care have better outcomes.Objectives: We sought to compare health care processes and outcomes for patients with HIV based on their preferred level of involvement in health...

  • Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. Entwistle, Vikki A.; Carter, Stacy M.; Cribb, Alan; McCaffery, Kirsten // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul2010, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p741 

    Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own...

  • Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study. Guerra, Carmen E.; Jacobs, Samantha E.; Holmes, John H.; Shea, Judy A. // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Jul2007, Vol. 22 Issue 7, p901 

    Background: Prostate cancer screening (PCS) is controversial. Ideally, patients should understand the risks and benefits of screening before undergoing PSA testing. This study assessed whether primary care physicians routinely discuss PCS and explored the barriers to and...

  • Impact of localizing physicians to hospital units on nurse-physician communication and agreement on the plan of care. O'Leary, Kevin J.; Wayne, Diane B.; Landler, Matthew P.; Kulkarni, Nita; Haviley, Corinne; Hahn, Katherine J.; Jeon, Jiyeon; Englert, Katherine M.; Williams, Mark V. // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Nov2009, Vol. 24 Issue 11, p1223 

    Background: A significant barrier to communication among patient care providers in hospitals is the geographic dispersion of team members.Objective: To determine whether localizing physicians to specific patient care units improves nurse-physician communication and...

  • Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. Locatis, Craig; Williamson, Deborah; Gould-Kabler, Carrie; Zone-Smith, Laurie; Detzler, Isabel; Roberson, Jason; Maisiak, Richard; Ackerman, Michael // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Apr2010, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p345 

    Background: Using trained interpreters to provide medical interpretation services is superior to services provided on an ad hoc basis, but little is known about the effectiveness of providing their services remotely, especially using video.Objective: To compare remote...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics