TITLE

McCONNELL, UNITED STATES SENATOR, et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al.: appeal for the united states district for the district of columbia

PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Law
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case McConnell, United States Senator, et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al., case number 02-1674, argued on September 8, 2003 and decided on December 10, 2003. Federal enactments designed to purge national politics of what is conceived to be the pernicious influence of big money campaign contributions include the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), which amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, the Communications Act of 1934, and other portions of the U.S. Code. The Congress sought to address three important developments, the increased importance of soft money, the proliferation of issue ads and the disturbing findings of a Senate investigation into campaign practices related to the 1996 federal elections, upon enacting BCRA.
ACCESSION #
19082031

 

Related Articles

  • High Court Strikes Down Ban on Minors' Giving. Keller, Bess // Education Week;1/7/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 16, p28 

    The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously overturned a section of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law barring people under 18 from making political contributions, as of January 7, 2004. The ruling last month came as part of the high court's lengthy decision in the McConnell v. Federal Election...

  • BETWEEN ACCESS AND INFLUENCE: BUILDING A RECORD FOR THE NEXT COURT. STRAUSE, RENATA E. B.; TOKAJI, DANIEL P. // Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy;2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p179 

    This Article considers the evidence that should be collected and developed to support the next generation of reforms before a future Supreme Court. It discusses but ultimately sidesteps theoretical debates over rationales for reform, focusing instead on the practical questions likely to face...

  • OLDERMINORS, THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR (ALMOST ENTIRELY) NONLETHAL ARMS, AND THE RIGHT TO DEFEND LIFE. Volokh, Eugene // Arizona State Law Journal;Summer2011, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p447 

    The article focuses on the constitutional rights of minors in the U.S. Topics discusses include the rule which don't bar older minors access to nonlethal weapons in most states, unconstitutionality of the ban on older minors' possession of nonlethal weapons under rights to bear arms and old...

  • Top 10 Supreme Court Decisions That Should Be Reversed.  // Human Events;1/16/2006, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p10 

    This article presents the top ten U.S. Supreme Court decisions that the author thinks should be reversed. Included here are Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas, Everson v. Board of Education, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, Grutter v. Bollinger, Plyer v. Doe, Baker v. Carr, and U.S. Term...

  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. COLORADO REPUBLICAN FEDERAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee, case number 00-191, argued on February 28, 2001 and decided on June 25, 2001. The case is related to the case Buckley v. Valeo, in which it was held that the...

  • JUDGE J. SKELLY WRIGHT: POLITICS, MONEY, AND EQUALITY. Lee, Carol F. // Loyola Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p93 

    An essay is presented on Judge J. Skelly Wright's opinion towards campaign funds in politics, racial inequality and economic inequality. Topics discussed include his decisions in cases related to corruptions in government, approval of the campaign finance legislation by the United States'...

  • Feeling One's Way on Finance Reform. Buckley Jr., William F. // National Review;4/16/2001, Vol. 53 Issue 7, p62 

    This article focuses on a controversy over campaign-finance reform in the U.S. It is not fully correct that conservatives in the U.S. oppose any limitations on political spending on the grounds that such limitations are unconstitutional. The current discussion over political financing begs for a...

  • Corruption Temptation. Charles, Guy-Uriel E. // California Law Review;Feb2014, Vol. 102 Issue 1, p25 

    In response to Professor Lawrence Lessig's Jorde Lecture, I suggest that corruption is not the proper conceptual vehicle for thinking about the problems that Professor Lessig wants us to think about. I argue that Professor Lessig's real concern is that, for the vast majority of citizens, wealth...

  • When a Contribution Becomes a Crime. Uram, Seth D. // Young Lawyer;Oct2008, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p1 

    A summary is presented of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), which regulates the financing of federal elections in the U.S.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics