TITLE

MUEHLER et al. v. MENA: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Law
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Muehler et al. v. Mena, case number 03-1423, argued on December 8, 2004 and decided on March 22, 2005. The case centers on the respondent's claim that her Fourth Amendment rights have been violated by a police detachment executing a search warrant of the premises where she lived and that police's questioning on her immigration status constituted another violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. The District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in favor of respondent. The U.S. Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case holding that the police detachment did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights.
ACCESSION #
19091528

 

Related Articles

  • In the Beginning. Karlan, Pamela S. // Boston Review;Sep/Oct2010, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p7 

    This article discusses the preservation of the U.S. Constitution and the formal amendments that reshaped the fundamental law through the years since its development in 1787. It explores the principles the surround the Constitution including liberty, equality and opportunity. It highlights the...

  • MILLER-EL v. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Miller-El v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, case number 03-9659, argued on December 6, 2004 and decided on June 13, 2005. The case centers on the petitioner's, who was tried...

  • BEARD, SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v. BANKS: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al v. Banks, case number 02-1603, argued on February 24, 2004, and decided on June 24, 2004. The court held that because the case Mills v. Maryland announced a new rule of...

  • JONES v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Jones v. United States, case number 99-5739, argued on March 21, 2000 and decided on Mary 22, 2000. The case involves a certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The case provides that petitioner Jones is accused...

  • MITCHELL et al. v. HELMS et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Mitchell et al. v. Helms et al., case number 98-1648, argued on December 1, 1999 and decided on June 28, 2000. The case involves the constitutionality of Chapter 2 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act of 1981. The law...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND THE SUPREME COURT: THE ARTICLE V PROBLEM. Segall, Eric J. // University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law;Nov2013, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p443 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the U.S. constitutional law and analyzes the interplay between the judicial review and Article V of the U.S. Constitution, which describes the process through which the Constitution can be altered, with regard to constitutional...

  • BESIDE THE LAW. Bork, Robert H. // National Review;10/19/92, Vol. 44 Issue 20, p38 

    The article criticizes the radical constitutional approach taken by the U.S. Supreme Court as of 1992. It comments on the lack of dominant theme that defines its authority. It discusses several Supreme Court decisions on abortion and on the issue of religion and state. It discusses the use of...

  • Recent Decisions: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT--THE DEMISE OF COLGATE V. HARVEY. J. W. P. // California Law Review;Mar1940, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p388 

    Discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on regarding the privileges or immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Reasons behind the ruling of the Supreme Court; Background of the U.S. Supreme Court case Colgate versus Harvey; Scope of the privileges or...

  • Right call by high court.  // Advertising Age;6/5/2000, Vol. 71 Issue 24, p26 

    This article presents the author's opinion regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's judgments in a dispute between the First Amendment rights of business and the powers of government to curb those rights. The court examined a 1996 federal law aimed at protecting children from incidental exposure to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics