TITLE

RBMK safety

AUTHOR(S)
Blackith, Robert
PUB. DATE
April 1987
SOURCE
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1987, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p52
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
Presents a letter to the editor of the April 1987 issue of the 'Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,' commenting on the 1983 assurance given by the International Atomic Energy Agency that a loss-of-coolant accident at the Chernobyl, Ukraine reactor was practically impossible and subsequent events that proved otherwise.
ACCESSION #
11019355

 

Related Articles

  • Waxman likens Japan disaster to Chernobyl. Fabian, Jordan // Hill;3/17/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 37, p18 

    The article reports on the belief of California Representative Henry Waxman that the nuclear crisis in 2011 in Japan is similar to the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine.

  • After Chernobyl. Jones, S.R. // New Scientist;2/16/91, Vol. 129 Issue 1756, p2 

    Presents a letter to the editor of 'New Scientist' magazine, about the environmental effects of the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster.

  • Psychiatric Problems of Emergency Workers in Nuclear Crisis: An Issue in Industrial Psychiatry. Joob, Beuy; Wiwanitkit, Viroj // Current Approaches in Psychiatry / Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasiml;2012, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p590 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT," by Z. Jaworowski.

  • Of mice and morals.  // New Scientist;10/20/90, Vol. 128 Issue 1739, p11 

    Comments on the European Patent Office's (EPO) refusal of a patent on a mouse whose genetically-induced susceptibility to cancer makes it valuable in research. Development of the genetically-engineered mouse by Harvard University; Rejection of Harvard's application on the grounds that the mouse...

  • Inside Chernobyl. Scrimsher, Michael W. // National Geographic;Aug2006, Vol. 210 Issue 2, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Inside Chernobyl," in the April 2006 issue of "National Geographic."

  • Inside Chernobyl. Piburn, Donald E. // National Geographic;Aug2006, Vol. 210 Issue 2, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Inside Chernobyl," in the April 2006 issue of "National Geographic."

  • Scientists in denial. Robinson, Brian // Geographical (Geographical Magazine Ltd.);Jul2006, Vol. 78 Issue 7, p100 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to a letter about the effects of the Chernobyl disaster in the June 2006 issue.

  • Chernobyl witness. Lindley, Richard // New Scientist;5/25/91, Vol. 130 Issue 1770, p3 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to an article about Chernobyl, by Roger Milne in the April 27 issue.

  • After Chernobyl. Jones, S.R. // New Scientist;2/16/91, Vol. 129 Issue 1756, p2 

    Presents a letter to the editor of 'New Scientist' magazine, about the environmental effects of the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics