Information on Selected Personnel Practices at the Justice Department: GAO-04-665R

Jones, Paul
April 2004
GAO Reports;4/22/2004, p1
Government Documents
This letter responds to a request that we provide information on selected personnel practices at the Justice Department. On March 1, 2004, we briefed Congress on the results of our review. This letter transmits information provided during that briefing. Specifically, the slides enclosed in this letter describe (1) Justice's hiring processes for entry-level and lateral (i.e., experienced) career attorneys, (2) the types of monetary awards Justice grants to political appointees and the number of awards granted from 1993 through 2002, and (3) Justice's selection process for the position of the Assistant Attorney General for Administration. Justice hires entry-level attorneys through the Attorney General's Honors Program. Conducted on an annual basis, the program is the only way that Justice hires graduating law students. Nine Justice components participate in this program, which include the six litigating divisions (Antitrust, Civil, Civil Rights, Criminal, Environment and Natural Resources, and Tax), the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), and the U.S. Trustees Office. Under the direction and management of the Office of Attorney Recruitment and Management (OARM), the components are responsible for various aspects of the fivestep hiring process. Justice's hiring of lateral attorneys, which occurs on a year-round basis, is a largely decentralized process that involves Justice's 40 components and individual units (i.e., sections or branches) within those components. Each component and unit devises its own process for accomplishing lateral hiring. Justice grants two types of monetary awards to political appointees under Schedule C and noncareer Senior Executive Service (SES) status in recognition of overall highlevel performance or a special act or service. Granted in the form of lump-sum cash, the two types of awards are (1) the Special Achievement Award for Sustained Superior Performance and (2) the Special Achievement Award for Special Act or Service. From 1993 through 2002, Justice granted a total of 49 monetary awards, at an average award amount of $1,817. The average annual award amount ranged from $375 in 1996 to $3,868 in 2002. Justice's selection of an Assistant Attorney General for Administration is based on its merit competition process. That is, the vacancy is announced publicly for a minimum of 14 days. Application screening and candidate selection follow a set of predetermined eligibility requirements based on position qualifications. An Executive Resources Board, composed of three SES members nominated by the Deputy Attorney General, selects the best-qualified candidates. These candidates are interviewed by either the Deputy Attorney General or a panel of SES members. The successful candidate is approved by the Attorney General-- subject to the President's approval--and certified by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).


Related Articles

  • GOPers aren't the only ones miffed at Schumer.  // Hill;10/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 121, p18 

    The article reports on the annoyance felt by Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee against Senator Charles Schumer in the U.S. It states that the long introduction delivered by Schumer at the confirmation hearing of Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey caused his...

  • Obama's Hill Allies: Judicial Nominees. Cohen, Richard E.; Friel, Brian; Victor, Kirk // National Journal;11/15/2008, p20 

    The article discusses the selection of nominees for justice of the U.S. Supreme Court in the advent of the administration of President-elect Barack Obama. It says that Obama will need his trusted allies in the Senate even if Democrats control it. Obama will reportedly seek help from trusted...

  • Pickering and Choosing.  // National Review;4/8/2002, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p14 

    This article focuses on Judge Charles Pickering whose nomination to an appeals court was defeated by Democrats of the Judiciary Committee in the U.S. He was treated badly by both political parties. The Democrats felt embarrassed by their tactics, as witness their efforts to squirm away from...

  • LGBT families are left out of immigration bill.  // Empty Closet;Jun2013, Issue 468, p5 

    The article reports on the comprehensive immigration reform bill pending in the U.S. Senate. It discusses the withdrawal of the amendment proposed by Chairman Patrick Leahy of the Senate Judiciary Committee that would give equal immigration rights to same-sex spouse of American citizens to...

  • SENATOR ORDERS GONZALES TO FIX PSOB.  // Fire Chief;Aug2007, Vol. 51 Issue 8, p15 

    The article reports on the appearance of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales before the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) regarding the Hometown Heroes Act in the U.S. According to Leahy, the Department of Justice (DOJ) used its regulatory authority to shift the burden of...

  • Google and Free Speech: Fair-Weather Friends? Jerome, Sara // National Journal;9/3/2011, p11 

    The article offers a brief background on the Protect IP Act, a bill introduced by U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, which expands the Justice Department's power to take action against Web sites that facilitate online piracy and copyright infringement. The bill is being...

  • The Hun Is at the Gate. Coulter, Ann // Human Events;12/3/2001, Vol. 57 Issue 45, p6 

    Criticizes the stand of several politicians in United States on the war against terrorism. Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.); Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); Attorney General John Ashcroft.

  • Kennedy deemed 2nd most powerful lawmaker in Senate. Malmgren, Jessica // Hill;3/4/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 24, p6 

    The article highlights the annual power rankings of U.S. legislators. According to the author, the ranking is conducted by Knowlegis LLC which aims to assert the influential member of the Congress. They include Nancy Pelosi as the most influential lawmaker, followed by Edward Moore Kennedy as...

  • Executive privilege showdown. Crabtree, Susan; Jacobs, Jeremy // Hill;6/29/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 80, p1 

    The article reports on the confrontation between the Congressional Democrats and U.S. President George W. Bush over the executive privilege. The administration set aside five congressional subpoenas, stating that executive documents and communications considering the firing of several attorneys...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics