National Credit Union Central Liquidity Facility Lending Before the Year 2000 Date Change: GGD-00-143R

McCool, Thomas J.
May 2000
GAO Reports;5/23/2000, p1
Government Document
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the lending activity of the National Credit Union Central Liquidity Facility (CLF), focusing on: (1) CLF's lending during October through December 1999; and (2) credit union borrowing from the discount window and the comparison between credit unions' cost of borrowing from CLF to the cost of alternative sources of liquidity. GAO noted that: (1) CLF lending increased during the last 3 months of 1999; (2) because of the prospect of problems related to the year 2000 date change, CLF set up expedited procedures for lending in order to meet year 2000-related liquidity demands; (3) as a result, any credit union qualifying for access with a stated liquidity need was eligible to obtain loans from CLF; (4) however, of the approximately 10,000 credit unions in the United States, less than 1 percent (38 in total) of all credit unions obtained loans from CLF during the October through December 1999 timeframe; (5) although the total amount that CLF loaned was about $666 million, the largest value of loans outstanding on any given day was about $159 million; (6) in most cases, the determination regarding whether a credit union would obtain a loan from CLF was made by the credit union's corporate credit union; (7) when a credit union notified its corporate credit union of a need to borrow liquidity, the corporate credit union decided whether to make a loan to the credit union itself or to go to CLF on behalf of the credit union; (8) during this same period, 25 credit unions also borrowed from the Federal Reserve's discount window; (9) by law, use of the discount window requires that all borrowers, including credit unions, maintain reservable transaction accounts or nonpersonal time deposits; (10) nearly two-thirds of all credit unions qualify for access to the discount window, including most of the largest; (11) of the two types of discount window credit most used by credit unions during this period, one--adjustment credit--had an interest rate somewhat lower than the rate charged by CLF; (12) the rate on the other widely used discount window loan--the Special Liquidity Facility, which was a special credit available in advance of year 2000--was considerably higher than the CLF rate; (13) under ordinary circumstances, corporate credit union officials said that most credit unions would look first to their corporate credit union to satisfy liquidity needs; (14) the rates that two corporate credit unions charged their members for non-CLF loans were also higher than CLF charged; and (15) however, because the corporate credit unions increased the rate they charged on CLF loans to cover expenses before passing CLF credit on to their member credit unions, the actual rate paid by members of the two corporate credit unions for CLF loans was closer to the rates charged for non-CLF liquidity loans.


Related Articles

  • Liquidity Squeeze Cited For SimpliCD Growth.  // Credit Union Journal;9/19/2005, Vol. 9 Issue 37, p2 

    Discloses that a liquidity squeeze at some credit unions is the primary driver behind a 76-percent growth in the number of credit unions participating in the SimpliCD program offered by credit union service organization Primary Financial. Credit unions' participation in the program in order to...

  • Bankruptcy Education? Others Won't Do It For You. Radtke, Dick; Harr, Lucy // Credit Union Journal;4/15/2002, Vol. 6 Issue 15, pN.PAG 

    Discusses several issues concerning bankruptcy education of credit unions in the U.S. Importance for credit unions to discuss the disadvantages of declaring bankruptcy and offer alternatives to members; Advantages of credit unions with financial counseling programs in dealing with bankruptcy;...

  • It All Comes Back To Liquidity.  // Credit Union Journal;5/1/2006, Vol. 10 Issue 17, p15 

    The article reports on the effects of liquidity on credit unions in the United States. The tightening of liquidity will mean that credit unions will have to raise their deposit rates. Credit unions will have to ensure they have downside protection so that they are ready if and when rates take...

  • Surging Liquidity Pushes CU Trust Past $1B.  // Credit Union Journal;2/25/2008, Vol. 12 Issue 7, p3 

    The article reports on the rise of credit union investments in the Trust for Credit Unions Money Market Portfolio to $1.047 billion. According to Callahan Financial Services, the rise was due to the rapid build-up in credit union liquidity. The Trust was established by credit unions to provide...

  • E--Scan: Become an early adopter. Peterson, Ann Hayes // Credit Union Magazine;Jul2002, Vol. 68 Issue 7, p41 

    Discusses the actions that credit unions must do in order to support and protect their initiatives and customer relationships. Reason for the importance of preparing credit unions to compete in the click and mortar operating environment; Topics presented by environmental-scan reports;...

  • SEVENTY--FIVE YEARS AGO--JULY 1927. Kirkpatrick, Gabriel // Credit Union Magazine;Jul2002, Vol. 68 Issue 7, p74 

    Presents a historical account concerning credit unions in the U.S. in July 1927. Date when the credit union legislation became effective; Firs credit union organized under the law; State credit union assets reported by the Massachusetts Commission of Banks at the end of 1926.

  • Prompt Corrective Action on Center Stage.  // Credit Union Directors Newsletter;Feb2000, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p1 

    Reports on prompt corrective action (PCA) issues facing credit unions in the United States in 2000.

  • The Seven Greatest Challenges CUs Face.  // Credit Union Directors Newsletter;May2000, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p1 

    Cites the seven greatest challenges facing credit union leaders in the United States in the 21st century, according to McCuistion & Associates' Dennis McCuistion.

  • Corporates To Meet, But Few Optimistic On Regional Merger. Freeman, Lisa; Roberts, Ed // Credit Union Journal;7/1/2002, Vol. 6 Issue 26, p1 

    Reports that Midwest corporates will attend a meeting called by the Missouri Corporate Credit Union to discuss the formation of a regional conglomerate corporate. Comments of Mike Keim, chief executive officer (CEO) of the Nebraska Corporate Central FCU, on the corporates' rejection of the...


Read the Article

Other Topics