TITLE

Scientists in denial

AUTHOR(S)
Robinson, Brian
PUB. DATE
July 2006
SOURCE
Geographical (Geographical Magazine Ltd.);Jul2006, Vol. 78 Issue 7, p100
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to a letter about the effects of the Chernobyl disaster in the June 2006 issue.
ACCESSION #
21732310

 

Related Articles

  • After Chernobyl. Jones, S.R. // New Scientist;2/16/91, Vol. 129 Issue 1756, p2 

    Presents a letter to the editor of 'New Scientist' magazine, about the environmental effects of the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster.

  • Psychiatric Problems of Emergency Workers in Nuclear Crisis: An Issue in Industrial Psychiatry. Joob, Beuy; Wiwanitkit, Viroj // Current Approaches in Psychiatry / Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasiml;2012, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p590 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT," by Z. Jaworowski.

  • Of mice and morals.  // New Scientist;10/20/90, Vol. 128 Issue 1739, p11 

    Comments on the European Patent Office's (EPO) refusal of a patent on a mouse whose genetically-induced susceptibility to cancer makes it valuable in research. Development of the genetically-engineered mouse by Harvard University; Rejection of Harvard's application on the grounds that the mouse...

  • Inside Chernobyl. Scrimsher, Michael W. // National Geographic;Aug2006, Vol. 210 Issue 2, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Inside Chernobyl," in the April 2006 issue of "National Geographic."

  • Inside Chernobyl. Piburn, Donald E. // National Geographic;Aug2006, Vol. 210 Issue 2, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Inside Chernobyl," in the April 2006 issue of "National Geographic."

  • Chernobyl witness. Lindley, Richard // New Scientist;5/25/91, Vol. 130 Issue 1770, p3 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to an article about Chernobyl, by Roger Milne in the April 27 issue.

  • After Chernobyl. Jones, S.R. // New Scientist;2/16/91, Vol. 129 Issue 1756, p2 

    Presents a letter to the editor of 'New Scientist' magazine, about the environmental effects of the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster.

  • THE NUCLEAR DEBATE. Webb, Hugh // Investigate;Oct2004, Vol. 4 Issue 46, p6 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to an article regarding the Chernobyl reactor failure in Ukraine.

  • Don't underestimate the death rate from Chernobyl. Mousseau, Timothy A.; Nelson, Neal; Shestopalov, V. // Nature;10/20/2005, Vol. 437 Issue 7062, p1089 

    Presents a letter to the editor in the response to the article "Chernobyl: poverty and stress pose 'bigger threat' than radiation" in the previous issue.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics