TITLE

Stem-cell decision is no threat to federal science funding

AUTHOR(S)
Casey, Samuel B.
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Nature;9/2/2010, Vol. 467 Issue 7311, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Letter
ABSTRACT
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article regarding the implications of federal government funding on human embryonic cell stem-cell research to science funding of the government in the 2010 issue.
ACCESSION #
53473432

 

Related Articles

  • NEXT BATTLE IN THE STEM-CELL WAR. Munro, Neil // National Journal;9/1/2001, Vol. 33 Issue 35, p2676 

    Focuses on the proposed federal funding for embryonic stem cell research in the United States. Views of Tommy G. Thompson, Health and Human Services Secretary, on research funding; Opposition on the proposed research funds; Amount of federal fund proposed for the research; Issues surrounding...

  • THE NUCLEAR OPTION. Pasinski, David E. // Commonweal;8/12/2005, Vol. 132 Issue 14, p38 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Misleading Photos," in the June 17, 2005 issue.

  • Stem Cell Debate. Taylo, Julie // Fortune;10/3/2005, Vol. 152 Issue 7, p16 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "Can Frist Hold the Middle Ground?", in the September 5, 2005 issue.

  • Federal policy and the use of pluripotent stem cells. Scott, Christopher Thomas; McCormick, Jennifer B.; DeRouen, Mindy C.; Owen-Smith, Jason // Nature Methods;Nov2010, Vol. 7 Issue 11, p866 

    A letter to the editor is presented discussing the impact of the U.S. federal policy on human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research on stem cell researchers.

  • Missed opportunity for stem-cell research. Guharoy, Roy // American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy;1/15/2007, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p136 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the refusal of U.S. President George W. Bush on the bill that would expand the federal support on embryonic stem-cell research in a previous issue.

  • Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Chambers, Stuart M; Fasano, Christopher A; Papapetrou, Eirini P; Tomishima, Mark; Sadelain, Michel; Studer, Lorenz // Nature Biotechnology;Mar2009, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p275 

    Current neural induction protocols for human embryonic stem (hES) cells rely on embryoid body formation, stromal feeder co-culture or selective survival conditions. Each strategy has considerable drawbacks, such as poorly defined culture conditions, protracted differentiation and low yield. Here...

  • Unify guidelines for reviewing embryonic stem-cell research. Johnston, Josephine // Nature;7/8/2010, Vol. 466 Issue 7303, p179 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about governing rules of embryonic stem cells research in the U.S.

  • Stem cell hypocrisy. Hsu, Andro // New Scientist;8/26/2006, Vol. 191 Issue 2566, p22 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on the stand of U.S. President George W. Bush against embryonic stem cell research.

  • Stem cell hypocrisy. Rohlik, Harold // New Scientist;8/26/2006, Vol. 191 Issue 2566, p22 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on the stand of U.S. President George W. Bush against embryonic stem cell research.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics