Executive Compensation: The Alignment Myth

January 2013
NACD Directorship;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p70
The author discusses pay for performance programs proposed by the shareholders of U.S. company board of directors about effective compensation system for executives in a corporate. The autos are critical of assessments through which the compensations are provided including payment techniques, actual share value of employees, and pay for performance being genuinely objective.


Related Articles

  • Board pay affects executive pay. Elson, Charles M. // Corporate Board;Mar/Apr94, Vol. 15 Issue 85, p7 

    Proposes an equity-based approach for fixing compensation of directors and executives of corporations. Issues concerning overcompensation of executives; Limitations of federal regulations that set executive pay deductibility limit; Stock ownership; Lengthened director terms; Potential costs of...

  • Testing Pay for Performance. Havey, Chris; Limmer, James // NACD Directorship;Sep/Oct2015, Vol. 41 Issue 5, p72 

    The article discusses the process of testing pay for performance and its importance to ensure the directors of a company of the effectiveness of the compensation programs. Topics covered include the advantages of testing the alignment of pay with performance in benchmarking the executive pay of...

  • Paying Smart. Zingheim, Patricia K.; Schuster, Jay R. // Executive Excellence;Jul2001, Vol. 18 Issue 7, p11 

    Suggests wage payment schemes for helping companies retain talented people. Re-pricing of options; Base pay adjustments; Companies' need for pay and reward solutions justified and based on contribution to the business.

  • OUT OF STEP. Dent, Georgina // BRW;10/2/2008, Vol. 30 Issue 39, p48 

    The article provides information on the compensation system of law firms in Australia. It states that the two remunerations that proliferate in law firms such as Malleson Stephen Jaques and Gilberty + Tobin are the lockstep model and merit-based system. It also offers the advantages and...

  • Institutional investors are dissatisfied with U.S. executive pay.  // Corporate Board;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 27 Issue 157, p28 

    The article reports on the dissatisfaction felt by institutional investors over the way many companies determine executive pay packages in the U.S. According to a study conducted by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, 90 percent of investors think the system has overpaid executives, and 85 percent say it...

  • CURRENT TRENDS FOR COMPENSATION COMMITTEES. Shaw, David // Directors & Boards;2016 Second Quarter, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p35 

    The article discusses the areas of continuing focus for the board of director's compensation committees which are outlined by Compensation Advisory Partners senior partner Rose Marie Orens. It includes aligning executive pay with performance, chief executive officer (CEO) pay ratios and the...

  • TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Conyon, Martin; Gregg, Paul // Economic Journal;May95, Vol. 105 Issue 430, p704 

    This article considers the issues, evidence and outline possible ways in which one may wish to reform pay setting practices for top executives in Great Britain. The evidence of restructuring of the overall compensation package received by senior management. The use of share incentive schemes or...

  • Revving Up Performance Pay. Tauber, Yale D. // NACD Directorship;Apr/May2008, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p66 

    The article focuses on the use of management compensation structures in private-equity deals as the ultimate pay-for-performance model for the public sector. It is said that understanding the executive pay structure in the private-equity sector and responding to the dilemma posed for...

  • Management pay settlements continue to fall -- but earnings start to rise.  // Management Services;Nov94, Vol. 38 Issue 11, p3 

    The article reports on the latest survey on management pay published by the British company Reward Group. It shows across-the-board pay settlements for managers averaged 2.6 per cent over the last 12 months to August 1994. This is 0.2 percent lower than the previous all-time-low of 2.8 percent...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics