TITLE

Special Education: Additional Assistance and Better Coordination Needed among Education Offices to Help States Meet the NCLBA Teacher Requirements: GAO-04-659

AUTHOR(S)
Shaul, Marnie S.
PUB. DATE
July 2004
SOURCE
GAO Reports;7/15/2004, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Report
ABSTRACT
During the 2001-2002 school year, more than 400,000 special education teachers provided instructional services to approximately 6 million students with disabilities in U.S. schools. Two federal laws contain teacher qualification requirements that apply to special education teachers: the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Given the committee's interest in issues related to highly qualified special education teachers, we are providing information about (1) the state certification requirements, including the use of alternative certification programs, for special education teachers, and how they relate to NCLBA requirements; (2) the factors that facilitate or impede state efforts to ensure that special education teachers meet NCLBA requirements; and (3) how different offices in the Department of Education (Education) assist states in addressing NCLBA teacher requirements. In the 2002-2003 school year, all states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico required that special education teachers have a bachelor's degree and be certified to teach--two of NCLBA's teacher qualification requirements--and half required special education teachers to demonstrate subject matter competency in core academic subjects, which is the third requirement. Specifically, 24 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico required their teachers to demonstrate some level of subject matter competency by having a degree or passing state tests in the core academic subjects that they wished to teach. Teachers of core academic subjects in the remaining states that did not have such requirements might not be positioned to meet the NCLBA requirements. To meet NCLBA teacher requirements, teachers would need to demonstrate competency in core academic subjects by the end of the 2005-2006 school year. State education officials reported that the availability of funds to support professional development facilitated implementation of the NCLBA teacher requirements, while other factors, such as uncertainty about how to apply the subject matter competency requirement to special education teachers, impeded implementation. State education officials and national education organizations' representatives we interviewed cited the need for more assistance from Education in explaining NCLBA's teacher requirements and identifying implementation strategies. Education has provided a range of assistance, such as site visits, Web-based guidance, and financial assistance, to help states implement the highly qualified teacher requirements. However, department coordination related to the implementation of NCLBA's teacher requirements for special education teachers has been limited.
ACCESSION #
18174328

 

Related Articles

  • No Child Left Behind reform that we can all support. McKeon, Buck // Hill;9/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 106, p49 

    The article discusses the author's views concerning the enhancement of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in the U.S. He expresses that NCLB allows the schools to track student progress, and improves the flexibility in the development of state accountability systems. The author also believes that...

  • TEACHERS: New and Old, Judged Chiefly on Same Standards. Keller, Bess // Education Week;11/2/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p17 

    The article discusses the Colorado's standard of deciding how veteran educators will meet the requirements of the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act. Colorado's standard is devoid of the loopholes that have drawn criticism to other states' policies, many of which, observers have suggested, fall short...

  • Prominent Panel Issues 75 Recommendations for Reauthorization of NCLB.  // NSTA Express;2/19/2007, p1 

    The article reports on the release of the recommendations by the Aspen Institute's No Child Left Behind Act Commission regarding the reauthorization of the federal education law. The commission issued 75 recommendations to the law around the themes of accountability, school improvement, highly...

  • your say. Braun, Valerie; Frankel, Wendy; Foote, Nancy; Willett, Belinda; Kraus, Kristin; Zylstra, Elizabeth // Instructor;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 115 Issue 5, p6 

    Several letters to the editor in response to articles in previous issues of Instructor including, "Making A Difference," by Charles Best in the October/November 2005 issue, "Getting Along With The Grown-Ups" in the September 2005 issue, and a reader has expressed his views on the No Child Left...

  • A Flaw in NCLB Is Acknowledged. Hoff, David J. // Education Week;2/27/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 25, p19 

    The article focuses on the U.S. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Comments from the Secretary of Education, Margaret Spellings, on the flaws in the act, such as the idea that states should report on persistently dangerous schools, are included and the assessment of school safety programs is...

  • STRETCHING TO THE NEXT RUNG. Pardini, Priscilla // Journal of Staff Development;Summer2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p14 

    The article reports that the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act requirements have set the bar for many paraprofessionals in the United States, while several states and districts have developed high-quality training that surpasses the national law. Under the NCLB Act, all paraprofessionals working...

  • The Highly Qualified Teacher. McElroy, Edward J. // Teaching Pre K-8;Oct2005, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p8 

    Focuses on the steps that should be taken by teachers to meet the highly qualified teacher provision of the No Child Left Behind law in the U.S. Factors that should be addressed to improve teacher quality; Features of an ideal mentoring program; Efforts of the American Federation of Teachers to...

  • Leadership Gap Seen in Post-NCLB Changes in U.S. Teachers. Sawchuk, Stephen // Education Week;9/10/2008, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses a study by educational research group RAND Corp. that says school principals and district leaders are not in control of instructional changes teachers are making to deal with accountability pressures stemming from the No Child Left Behind Act. Teachers are focusing more...

  • TEACHERS: Point System Available to Earn 'Qualified' Status. Sack, Joetta L. // Education Week;11/2/2005, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p16 

    The article discusses the mandate of the No Child Left Behind Act of the U.S. that a highly qualified teacher be in every classroom in which a core subject is taught by the end of the 2005-06 school year. Plenty of skeptics say that states and districts would not be able to meet this demanding...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics