TITLE

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Preliminary Observations on Efforts to Improve Security at Nuclear Power Plants: GAO-04-1064T

AUTHOR(S)
Wells, Jim
PUB. DATE
September 2004
SOURCE
GAO Reports;9/14/2004, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Report
ABSTRACT
The events of September 11, 2001, and the subsequent discovery of commercial nuclear power plants on a list of possible terrorist targets have focused considerable attention on the plants' capabilities to defend against a terrorist attack. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), an independent agency established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 to regulate the civilian use of nuclear materials, is responsible for regulating and overseeing security at commercial nuclear power plants. GAO was asked to review (1) NRC's efforts since September 11, 2001, to improve security at nuclear power plants, including actions NRC has taken to implement some of GAO's September 2003 recommendations to improve security oversight and (2) the extent to which NRC is in a position to assure itself and the public that the plants are protected against terrorist attacks. This testimony reflects the preliminary results of GAO's review. GAO will issue a more comprehensive report in early 2005. NRC responded quickly and decisively to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks with multiple steps to enhance security at commercial nuclear power plants. NRC immediately advised the plants to go to the highest level of security according to the system in place at the time and issued advisories and orders to the plants to make certain enhancements, such as installing more physical barriers and augmenting security forces, that could be completed quickly to shore up security. According to NRC officials, their inspections found that the plants complied with these advisories and orders. Later, in April 2003, NRC issued a new design basis threat (DBT), which establishes the maximum terrorist threat that a facility must defend against, and required the plants to develop and implement new security plans to address the new threat by October 2004. It is also improving its force-on-force exercises, as GAO recommended in its September 2003 report. These exercises are an important agency tool to ensure that the plants' security plans are adequate to protect against the DBT. While its efforts to date have enhanced security, NRC is not yet in a position to provide an independent determination that each plant has taken reasonable and appropriate steps to protect against the new DBT. According to NRC officials, the facilities' new security plans are on schedule to be implemented by October 2004. However, NRC's review of the plans, which are not available to the general public for security reasons, has primarily been a paper review and is not detailed enough for NRC to determine if the plans would protect the facility against the threat presented in the DBT. For example, the plans GAO reviewed are largely based on a template and often do not include important site-specific information, such as where responding guards are stationed, how the responders would deploy to their defensive positions, and how long deployment would take. In addition, NRC officials are generally not visiting the facilities to obtain site-specific information and assess the plans in terms of each facility's layout. NRC is largely relying on force-on-force exercises it conducts to test the plans, but these exercises will not be conducted at all facilities for 3 years. NRC's oversight of plants' security could also be improved. However, NRC does not plan to make some improvements in its inspection program that GAO previously recommended and still believes are needed. For example, NRC is not following up to verify that all violations of security requirements have been corrected or taking steps to make "lessons learned" from inspections available to other NRC regional offices and nuclear power plants. Moreover, if NRC needs to revise its DBT further as the terrorist threat is better defined, it will need longer to make and test all the necessary enhancements. The Department of Energy, for example, is currently reviewing the DBT for its nuclear facilities.
ACCESSION #
18174457

 

Related Articles

  • Nuke Plants: Secure and More Secure. Zink, John C. // Power Engineering;Mar2005, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p28 

    Discusses security requirements implemented by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for nuclear power plants in the U.S. on October 29, 2004. Number of days given by the NRC to to licensees to implement the security requirements; Involvement of the New York state government in nuclear...

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NRC Needs to Do More to Ensure that Power Plants Are Effectively Controlling Spent Nuclear Fuel: GAO-05-339.  // GAO Reports;4/8/2005, p1 

    Spent nuclear fuel--the used fuel periodically removed from reactors in nuclear power plants--is too inefficient to power a nuclear reaction, but is intensely radioactive and continues to generate heat for thousands of years. Potential health and safety implications make the control of spent...

  • NUCLEAR POWER: Analysis of Regional Differences and Improved Access to Information Could Strengthen NRC Oversight.  // GAO Reports;10/17/2013, preceding p1 

    A report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is presented that reviews the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) inspection of the safety of commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S. The report reviews the agency's methods and guidance employed for the oversight. As per the...

  • Oversight and Status of Implementing a Risk-Informed Approach to Fire Safety.  // GAO Reports;11/26/2012, preceding p1 

    The article reports on the study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding the progress of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in resolving the fire safety concerns raised by 2008 GAO report on nuclear power plant under the deterministic approach. It explores the...

  • Nuclear threat to US national security.  // Modern Power Systems;Nov2001, Vol. 21 Issue 11, p5 

    Reports the actions taken by political leaders and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to threats of nuclear terrorism in the United States. Increase of vigilance and preparedness at nuclear power plants; Provisions of National Guard patrols at nuclear sites; Placement of concrete road barricades.

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Oversight of Nuclear Power Plant Safety Has Improved, but Refinements Are Needed: GAO-06-1029.  // GAO Reports;9/27/2006, p1 

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is responsible for overseeing the nation's 103 commercial nuclear power plants to ensure they are operated safely. The safety of these plants has always been important, since an accident could release harmful radioactive material. NRC's oversight has...

  • Additional Actions Needed to Increase the Security of U.S. Industrial Radiological Sources. Trimble, David // GAO Reports;6/12/2014, preceding p1 

    The article presents the statement of David Trimble, director of the U.S. Natural Resources and Environment, about the security of the industrial radiological sources. He discusses the challenges facing by federal agencies in securing industrial radiological sources. He describes the important...

  • Status of Recent and Ongoing Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rulemaking Efforts. Kelly, Michael F.; Giantelli, Adelaide // Proceedings of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Ann;2009, p1 

    Since the formation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), our mission has been to license civilian, peaceful uses of radioactive material but, at the same time, to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety, and to promote the common defense and security, and...

  • NRC Sees Security 'Degradation' At One Nuke Facility; NFS Upping Protection. Lobsenz, George // Defense Daily;7/15/2009, Vol. 243 Issue 10, p4 

    The article reports on the statement made by the U.S. Nuclear Regulator Commission (NRC) at the Congress that the operators of the nuclear fuel plant in Tennessee have indicated moderate degradation in securing the plant in 2009. The Congress has also been told by the NRC that its 2008 security...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics