The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Has It Brought About Changes in the Boards of Large U. S. Corporations?

Valenti, Alix
August 2008
Journal of Business Ethics;Aug2008, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p401
Academic Journal
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is considered by many to have made the most sweeping changes affecting corporate governance since the Securities and Exchange Acts of 1933 and 1934. About 4 years after its passing, however, many governance experts question whether the time and expense of compliance engender any real reforms. This article examines whether corporations have restructured their boards in response to the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley and finds evidence that companies are implementing changes that should strengthen the monitoring ability of their boards.


Related Articles

  • A comparison of the Viable System Model and Seven Models of Risk with the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. Leonard, Allenna // Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change;2006, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p85 

    A strong need to respond to threats to the credibility of large corporations and their auditors in the wake of scandal led to the passage of legislation focused on controls rather than control. The limitations of this approach are discussed and compared with the more comprehensive perspective of...

  • CATALYSTS FOR CHANGE IN BOARD GOVERNANCE PRACTICES: THE CASE OF THE INTRODUCTION OF NATIONAL POLICY 58 - 201 IN CANADA. Khemakhem, Hanen; Gélinas, Patrice; Baillargeon, Lisa // Journal of Legal, Ethical & Regulatory Issues;2014, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p129 

    This paper investigates the impact of the adoption of National Policy 58-201 in 2005 on board governance practices in Canada. We find that National Policy 58 - 201, which suggests that issuers adopt voluntarily an array of board governance best practices, has improved board governance practices...

  • Companies see benefits from Sarbanes-Oxley. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;11/26/2007, Vol. 41 Issue 48, p4 

    The article reports on the mixed reactions of some chief executive officers and experts on the alleged benefits of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Even chief executive officers say Sarbanes-Oxley, the difficult-to-comply-with law enacted in the wake of the fraudulent accounting practices...

  • The European Commission Publishes its Action Plan on Modernizing European Company Law & Enhancing Corporate Governance in Response to Enron, Ahold, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Nathan, Charles M.; Poitras, Jean Paul; Von Randow, Philipp; Von Teichman, Christoph; Wolf, Gunnar // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the publication of the an action plan for Modernizing Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the EU, by the European Commission in 2003. The action plan is the commission's response to prevent another Enron, Ahold and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, allowing Member State...

  • What Departing Directors Need to Know. Wilson, Steve // Risk Management (00355593);Jan/Feb2009, Vol. 56 Issue 1, p54 

    This article discusses the liability of business directors for criminal fraud prosecution under the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The importance of Section 804 of Title VIII — Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability is assessed. Issues relating to the assessment of the behavior of...

  • Reaction to Sarbanes-Oxley ... Then and Now.  // Financial Executive;Jul2012, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p41 

    An interview is presented with Denny Beresford, former chairman of the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB). Beresford states that he was not surprised by any of the features of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley corporate finance and accounting law when it was enacted in 2002. He discusses the...

  • Size Does Matter: An Examination of the Economic Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley. Small, Ken; Ionici, Octavian; Hong Zhu // Review of Business;Spring/Summer2007, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p47 

    We employ an event study analysis to examine the market reaction to congressional agreement on the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We find that as firm size increases, the negative impact of Sarbanes-Oxley's passage decreases. The results show that the difference in abnormal returns...

  • SHOULD SIZE MATTER WHEN REGULATING FIRMS? IMPLICATIONS FROM BACKDATING OF EXECUTIVE OPTIONS. Anginer, Deniz; Narayanan, M. P.; Schipani, Cindy A.; Seyhun, H. Nejat // New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy;Winter2012, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses the association of the size of business enterprises with their regulatory restrictions. It state backdating scenario of providing an opportunity to foretell the firms engaging in illegal backdating. It states that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is being criticized because...

  • Restraining Overconfident CEOs through Improved Governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Banerjee, Suman; Humphery-Jenner, Mark; Nanda, Vikram // Review of Financial Studies;Oct2015, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p2812 

    The literature posits that some CEO overconfidence benefits shareholders, though high levels may not. We argue that adequate controls and independent viewpoints provided by an independent board mitigates the costs of CEO overconfidence. We use the concurrent passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics